Making the difference – involving parents better in schools

Question 13

On balance, do you agree that ‘rights of attendance’ for certain non-members of a parent forum should not be a part of the new arrangements ? In other words do you agree that non-members of the parent forum should attend only by invitation or do you believe the Headteacher should have the right to attend, with the councillor or other individual by invitation ?

"1”, “No - I think that an informal forum will not work.  Currently Board meetings are open public events which is one of their strengths giving them validity and accountability"

"2”, “No - disagree - See Question 5"

"3”, “No - see question 8"

"4”, “Should be open to parents, teachers and councillors - perhaps open to the public as well including press"

"5”, “Only if invited"

"6”, “Yes - agree with proposal - viz non-members by invitation only - tendency on our School Board for Headteacher to dictate/dogmatise and friction ensures if/when any parent challenges her.  I believe sufficient fora for Headteacher to have her input elsewhere."

"7”, “We feel there should be rights to attend for Headteacher, police, councillor or others of similar status"

"8”, “Yes"

"9”, “We agree"

"10”, “Do not agree with forum"

"11”, “It is vital that the Head Teacher be part of the School Board and any subsequent organisation in its place.  There can be no meaningful discussion about the progress of a school without school staff representation and without such representation there is grave danger of a gulf opening up between staff and parents and the organisation becoming a forum for petty complaints and suspicion.  It is also right that local councillors should have a right to attend.  They can give guidance about Local Authority thinking and are also a useful channel from the meetings to the Authority when questions need to be asked."

"12”, “"

"13”, “School should always be represented"

"14”, “The Head Teacher should always be invited or her elected representative."

"15”, “Head teacher and Councillor should attend and should be 'open' as at present"

"16”, “Yes I do believe that non-members should have the right to attend to ensure a balanced approach"

"17”, “Yes - by invitation only"

"18”, “Agree that non-members should attend by invitation only.  Account must be taken of proposals for changes in Scottish Local Government election process in 2007.
"

"19”, “The Head Teacher must attend all meetings"

"20”, “The current School Board set up is an excellent framework for governing attendance"

"21”, “Yes - they should be able to attend, openness is essential"

"22”, “Co-opted community members are invited - e.g. councillor and HT should have right to attend"

"23”, “Anyone who speaks to members should be able to attend"

"24”, “"

"25”, “No we don't agree but we agree HT should be at meetings and others through invitation"

"26”, “There are too many conflicting negatives in the question posed!  Why not decide beforehand which makes better sense!  Of course the HT should have the right to attend and also that the Councillor should retain the right to attend."

"27”, “Head Teacher and elected councillor should be required to attend"

"28”, “N/A"

"29”, “A teacher, preferably the HT should be part of any forum meeting - advisory capacity/immediacy of response.  Concern raised about developing a ""them"" and ""us"" culture.  Concern about what may be discussed at forum if staff not represented.  Unnecessary waste of time when staff or HT could respond to concerns if they were present rather than organising another meeting"

"30”, “-"

"31”, “"

"32”, “No - do not approve of proposed Bill"

"33”, “We believe in the necessity of having such as the Head Teacher or Councillor present and this is one reason for continuing with the School Board."

"34”, “I do not agree with the Bill.  School Boards work collaboratively with Head Teachers/Staff members.  Councillors can be an asset at certain times too."

"35”, “The entire Bill is flawed"

"36”, “No - keep School Boards"

"37”, “Head Teacher should have the right to attend"

"38”, “We think as a general rule it is pointless to have a meeting without the Head Teacher and certainly councillors should be encouraged to come"

"39”, “"

"40”, “All parents but public by invitation and Head Teacher and councillor open invitation"

"41”, “The right to know should not be withdrawn from parents of children attending the school.  Every Head Teacher should have the right to attend and not just by invitation."

"42”, “"

"43”, “Head Teacher, Councillors etc should have the right to attend"

"44”, “Head Teacher/Staff/Councillor/Clergy should have the right to attend"

"45”, “Board feels there should be a right to attendance, open to anyone, to attend meetings, unless the forum should wish to discuss any particular matter 'in camera'.  Board feels strongly that Head Teacher should be part of the school forum as Board feels this should be a partnership arrangement.  Any parent forum should promote a good relationship with the staff and school."

"46”, “No - Head Teacher and local councillor should have right to attend"

"47”, “Yes - they should be invited, but in the case of dispute with Council education members, parents should have the right to discuss these matters in private."

"48”, “The Head Teacher or a member of teaching staff is essential to good two-way communication.  Councillor to be invited at parents discretion"

"49”, “"

"50”, “"

"51”, “Non-members should have the right to attend.  As to what rights they have we are unsure.  Can they vote? Put item on agenda etc.  Constitution would be required"

"52”, “The Head Teacher and local member should have a right to attend.  The purpose of this exercise is to create ambitious, excellent schools.  The creation of a good working partnership between parents, head teachers and the education authority is essential to improving standards and quality of education.  The head teacher's advice at Board meetings is invaluable and a constructive dynamic approach can only be achieved through mutual respect and working closely together for the good of the school."

"53”, “"

"54”, “"

"55”, “The present system is more than adequate.  Why are you making it more complicated?"

"56”, “No they shouldn't.  Without the HT the thing would collapse and the Councillor always good."

"57”, “Anyone should have a right to attend - but not necessarily participate"

"58”, “HT and staff members should be required to attend"

"59”, “"

"60”, “Anyone with a legitimate interest in the school should be able to attend."

"61”, “The Head Teacher and Councillor should both have the right to attend all meetings of the parent forum to ensure the needs of the school are addresses, the forum understands its responsibility to the wider community"

"62”, “"

"63”, “HT should have the right to attend as an adviser"

"64”, “Attendance of the HT is an integral part of the functioning of the School Board.  Without the Head Teacher's attendance there can be no dialogue between parents and school therefore the HT's attendance is mandatory for the functioning of such an organisation."

"65”, “"

"66”, “"

"67”, “We believe that it is essential that all Head Teachers e required to attend parent forums in order that its discussions are well informed and there is a continuing dialogue over issues of concern to parents.  We believe that classroom teachers, senior pupils and councillors should retain a right of attendance since they may all offer valuable perspectives on matters that concern parents.  Dialogue between parents and each of these groups is valuable means of partnership.  If they were to attend by invitation only, the parents forums might lose some possibilities for unanticipated discussion and debate."

"68”, “All meetings should be completely open.  Head Teacher's attendance should be mandatory.  Only exceptions would be for e.g. consideration of a short leet for senior school appointments"

"69”, “The overall feeling of this group is that the HT or other teaching staff should be in attendance as it would defeat the purpose of the forum to discuss school matters without a full input.  These meetings should be open to anyone with an interest although the right of speech should be with the chair of the group."

"70”, “The Board felt that rights of attendance should be part of the new arrangements.  We feel that attending councillors, Head Teacher, education authority rep are a vital link with the wider community and school"

"71”, “"

"72”, “"

"73”, “"

"74”, “No - believe staff and council should have the right to attend.  Promotes partnership"

"75”, “School Boards and PTAs are already open to those who have a right to attend and the parent forum should be open to all those who are concerned with the child's welfare."

"76”, “I think it should be open and flexible meeting for anyone to attend"

"77”, “No"

"78”, “No - as Parent Forums are only a proposal so we cannot agree.  However the Head Teacher must have the right to attend"

"79”, “Good communication with the school suggests that a Head Teacher or teacher representative should usually be present.  Anyone else should attend by invitation only."

"80”, “Rights of attendance as currently provided should endure."

"81”, “Any parent should have a right to attend by invitation or request.  Head Teachers should attend at the request of the forum.  Councillors should be invited to become co-opted members"

"82”, “There ought to be a right to attend for parents, Head Teacher and Councillor"

"83”, “"

"84”, “Current system should be retained.  Head Teacher should always have right to attend"

"85”, “For the new forums to be effective the Head Teacher as a minimum should be required to be a member.  Other co-opted members - staff and from the wider community - have provided valuable inputs and their membership should not only be encouraged but provided for.  Parents are not the founts of all knowledge."

"86”, “Head Teachers should have the right to attend with others by invitation.  Consider Parent/Teacher forum.  Staff need to be included.  A report should be sent to parents after each meeting or at least once a year."

"87”, “"

"88”, “All should have the right to attend as an observer and should be welcome to make representation to the organisation by a number of avenues."

"89”, “"

"90”, “"

"91”, “We believe that non-members, especially head teachers and local councillors, should have the right to attend, except for extraordinary meetings closed to non-members."

"92”, “We, as a school board, representing the views of parents whose children attend (our) school, are unanimously rejecting the new proposal, and are against abolishment of the Scottish School Board 1988 Act."

"93”, “Yes, we agree."

"94”, “If forums went ahead, head teachers & teachers would not be by invitation only, but part of the natural process."

"95”, “Meetings open to all."

"96”, “"

"97”, “We think rights of attendance should stay as they are."

"98”, “We believe, Head Teacher, Councillor and any other invited party should be able to attend."

"99”, “Not applicable"

"100”, “Rights of attendance should continue."

"101”, “We want the headmaster"

"102”, “There should be a mandatory duty for Headteachers, councillors and education offers to attend if asked."

"103”, “I think there is always a basis for the head teacher and the councillor to attend without them to my mind the parents are deprived of access."

"104”, “Need for Headteacher to ensure accurate information about the school.  Councillors & co-opted members bring valuable dimension to discussions."

"105”, “No."

"106”, “Depends on circumstances."

"107”, “Invitation only."

"108”, “Anyone should be allowed to attend."

"109”, “N / A"

"110”, “It is imperative for the Councillor, the head teacher, staff representatives and other non-parent representatives to be involved as members.  There should also be the option to invite others in as felt necessary."

"111”, “Head Teacher obviously has finger on pulse of what's going on throughout the school and what the needs of the school are, her opinion is invaluable to allow the Forum insight into the school and what they should be working to achieve.
The councillor also has invaluable input into schemes which may benefit the school and can ""fast track"" us to appropriate people.  She also has an interest in the Community as a whole.
Non-members may be allowed to attend by invitation.
(Head-teacher and Councillor should always attend)"

"112”, “"

"113”, “Head Teacher should have right to attend."

"114”, “Head teacher should always be welcome - this should be open to all who have some interest in the school."

"115”, “Yes, however it would be hoped that each forum would have a good enough relationship with the HT that they would wish to invite them anyway.  (see over)"

"116”, “Head Teacher should have the right to attend, along with any other interested party."

"117”, “The Head Teacher should have the right to attend as a member and should be expected to do so.  Others, such as further staff members and community representatives would attend by invitation."

"118”, “The Head Teacher should have the right to attend but the others only attend by invitation."

"119”, “Agree that head teacher should attend."

"120”, “The strength of the Board is that parents cannot hijack meetings with their own agendas."

"121”, “The existing arrangement should apply.  Whereby the head teacher could attend in an advisory capacity.  The involvement of the head teacher is desirable and should be encouraged."

"122”, “Councillors / Headteachers should have open invitations."

"123”, “All non-members should attend by invitation only.  However Headteacher attendance should be mandatory, together with a teacher."

"124”, “The make up of Board (forum) should be as is with representation of school on board."

"125”, “I feel Headteachers, teachers, councillors and education departments should have the right to attend."

"126”, “I can see no real gain from exclusion of non-members of a parent forum who are essential to achieving what the whole exercise is about - cooperation in the best interests of the pupils."

"127”, “Both Head Teacher and Councillor should have the right to attend."

"128”, “Blank"

"129”, “No.  We believe that head teachers and councillors should have a right to attendance.
We believe all partnerships should continue to be promoted for all those interested in the school."

"130”, “Not relevant, the present arrangements under the current school board legislation operate very satisfactorily."

"131”, “Headteacher, staff should attend by right.
Also local councillors.
At our meetings, parents seldom attend but when they do, they are invited to join the meeting and to address us on the issue they wish to raise."

"132”, “Blank"

"133”, “By invitation."

"134”, “The right to attend"

"135”, “No, it should be open to give everyone the right to air their views."

"136”, “Blank"

"137”, “Anyone who has an interest in the school should be allowed to attend - no invitations required, the school board / parents forum should not be seen as an exclusive club."

"138”, “Everyone with an interest should be allowed to attend."

"139”, “Disagree"

"140”, “No - open meetings are essential.  Head Teacher's attendance as advisors are crucial.    Co-opted members can offer impartial advice.  Clerk is also essential for recording of minutes, etc."

"141”, “We believe the Head Teacher must and should want to attend."

"142”, “Head teacher and councillor should have the right to participate."

"143”, “Head teacher & councillor should have right to attend.  All others by invitation."

"144”, “No - Head Teacher and Councillor should attend."

"145”, “"

"146”, “"

"147”, “N / A as we do not want forums and want school boards to remain."

"148”, “Should be rights of attendance"

"149”, “Right to attend"

"150”, “Same as current school board arrangements."

"151”, “N / A"

"152”, “Right to attend should remain as per current School Board legislation."

"153”, “No"

"154”, “Non-members should always be there or other representative."

"155”, “Blank"

"156”, “No.  We feel that the Headteacher is invaluable as an advisor to the Board and should have the right to attend.  The local councillor feeds back on council meetings and again we feel should be part of the forum."

"157”, “N / A"

"158”, “Yes by invitation with exception of head teacher."

"159”, “"

"160”, “N / A - existing system works well."

"161”, “No - it should be compulsory for a member of the school's senior management team to attend.  Councillors should have the right to attend."

"162”, “Meetings should be 'open' with formal agenda - includes other parents, teaching staff, councillors, etc  Someone should attend on behalf of the staff e.g. head teacher.  Councillors' attendance should be requested if specifically required."

"163”, “No - non-members should attend by invitation which could be a standing invitation."

"164”, “In any parental involvement group I think that the parents should always be in the majority but that there should also be staff representation and (in denominational schools) church representation.  I think this consultation should have promoted partnerships between parents, pupils and staff but the idea of parent forums doesn't seem to have that at its heart."

"165”, “Not willing to answer 'loaded' questions about something unnecessary."

"166”, “"

"167”, “An obligation should be placed on the Head Teacher or staff member to attend and Councillors or other individuals should continue to have the right to attend."

"168”, “We are happy with the present situation.  The input of the Head Teacher is vital to the meeting.  Parents are currently invited to attend School Board meetings except where matters of confidentiality are to be discussed."

"169”, “Head Teachers - Essential.  Clerk - essential, Councillors - highly desirable.  Meetings must be open (Freedom of Information)"

"170”, “Meetings should be open as they are currently where all parents have the right to attend.  Head Teachers should always be able to attend as should councillors - councillors should attend at least once annually"

"171”, “All should have the right to attend as an observer and should be welcome to make representation to the organisation by a number of avenues."

"172”, “No - rights of attendance should be maintained to ensure that no personal interest is aired"

"173”, “The feeling would be that the Head Teacher should attend by right and teacher representative as at present.  The option should be that local political representation should have the opportunity of invitation dependent on whether the forum feels this necessary."

"174”, “Head Teacher and local authority attendance should be compulsory!  Parents must hear what management structure of education is about and must be able to influence change and policy."

"175”, “The Head Teacher should attend by right, to update parents and to hear what the parents say. With School Boards any parent can come to any School Board meeting.  Staff members are present also.  If there are forums where certain people cannot come if not invited, it will not improve school parent relationships at all."

"176”, “The Head Teacher should be in attendance as by right, otherwise the way is open for 'cabals' to be formed and this could 'open the door' to all sorts of problems as has happened before in the private sector (......... - 60s /70s parents took matters in to their own hands)  Schools should be a partnership between parents and staff - schools cannot exist - one without the other.
"

"177”, “Happy with current open ended provision"

"178”, “Non members should have the right to attend - they should be public meetings. Head Teachers, a member of staff and Councillors should be obliged to attend and lay a role as per current School Boards."

"179”, “The current School Board legislation is adequate in this respect.  No others should have a right to attend."

"180”, “The Head Teacher and councillor should have the right to attend.  There should definitely not be any need for an invitation."

"181”, “"

"182”, “Essential that Head Teacher attends and when and where relevant a councillor.  There was mixed feelings over the attendance of non-members of a parent forum."

"183”, “We feel that the current practice of open meetings should be maintained.  We feel the Head Teacher brings experience, expertise and insight and is in an ideal situation to act as advisor to the Board.  A Head Teacher's presence encourages communication and trust and discourages disunity and misunderstanding.  We feel Head Teachers have a right to attend - if difficulties do arise through personality clashes/poor communication, they are more likely to be resolved if the Head Teacher is required to be there."

"184”, “Don't agree as we do not support new structure of parents forum.  Comments from (the Minister's) letter dated 14th April contradicts itself through and though."

"185”, “"

"186”, “Head Teacher and councillor should have right to attend.  Members of education authority should be by invitation"

"187”, “Existing rules on attendance should apply."

"188”, “Right to attend.  Both."

"189”, “They should be able to attend as they do at present."

"190”, “I agree with automatic right of attendance for Headteachers, school senior management team and local councillors."

"191”, “"

"192”, “Current situation is acceptable.  Non members should be able to attend and invited to participate by chairperson. Head Teacher should be present"

"193”, “We believe the Head Teacher is crucial to the success of the forum as is the presence of a staff member on the Committee.  Councillors and others by invitation."

"194”, “Head Teachers and councillor should be members of the parent forum."

"195”, “I think it is very important that the Head Teacher attends.  Again we feel the current system works well."

"196”, “Head Teachers and councillors should have right to attend. Non-members can be invited on request, to attend."

"197”, “H/T right to attend  without invitation - councillor ditto."

"198”, “Head Teacher must have the right to attend.  Invitation to non members by invitation when relevant."

"199”, “No we feel strongly that these meetings should be open to Head Teachers, teaching staff, local councillors and interested members of the public, especially parents."

"200”, “Generally meetings should be open to teachers and parents.  However school forum could call a meeting for members only to discuss specific issues."

"201”, “The Head Teacher's involvement should be essential.  The Councillors should also attend as often as possible.  Anyone has the right to attend."

"202”, “Parents should have right to attend.  No need for invitation.  Imperative that staff attend too."

"203”, “As per previous responses we felt it was extremely important to have the HT/staff rep at meetings - the latter part of the question"

"204”, “No.  Non-members should continue to have rights of attendance."

"205”, “Headteacher and Councillor should continue to have the right to attend."

"206”, “Non-members - HT, councillor, clerk - should attend by right."

"207”, “I feel the Head Teacher should have a 'right' to attend any school meeting."

"208”, “HT must have right to attend - not a lot of point in forum discussing 'child' related issues / school without HT."

"209”, “I believe Headteacher, should attend parent forum meeting - carrying on with the existing ""partnership"" relationship."

"210”, “If it is to be only a Parent Forum will have a restricted remit - benefit of a school community approach will be lost.  Invitation is not appropriate puts head teacher, church representative and councillor outside - this will in the long term lead to the Parent Forums being ignored firstly by L.A., then by National Govt (as planned)."

"211”, “It is essential that Head Teacher or Deputy attends - should have the right and duty to attend."

"212”, “As question 10 ( School & council reps should have a right to attend. ) Head Teacher & council rep have a right to attend."

"213”, “The attendance of the Head Teacher is essential for both the parents and the Head Teacher; for the transfer of information and for successful communication channels.  Teacher representation is also vital and the presence of the councillor desirable.
As under the current system, parents should be able to meet informally if required."

"214”, “Head Teacher must have right to attend.
Councillor should be invited.
Other individuals at discretion of forum."

"215”, “Headteacher and other individuals should have the right to attend."

"216”, “No"

"217”, “Blank"

"218”, “Yes, by invitation."

"219”, “See Question 10 ( No.  We have valued the support of our co-opted members.  Also teacher representation & the Head Teacher in an advisory role help to inform the school board of issues relevant to the school. )"

"220”, “No"

"221”, “The present situation is fine."

"222”, “The Headteacher should have the right to attend.
As it is."

"223”, “No.  We believe that meaningful governance can only be provided by a board representing all stakeholders in the school and that all members of this governing body should hear all discussions."

"224”, “"

"225”, “Head Teacher and Councillor should attend as a right."

"226”, “We believe that non-parent members, especially the Head Teacher, other staff members, the councillor, or other individual should have the right to attend with the current restriction on participation applying."

"227”, “No I do not.  Councillors and Headteachers should have a right to attend."

"228”, “Under the current arrangements this problem would not arise.  We believe that the Head Teacher should always attend meetings."

"229”, “N / A"

"230”, “Blank"

"231”, “We thought these changes were to encourage a greater involvement for parents in their children’s education, not to put them off by rules and regulations."

"232”, “"

"233”, “No - we think that various non-members should have a right to attend, e.g. Head Teacher, Parish Representatives in denominational schools, Councillors etc., But above all PARENTS, who are prevented from attending under the terms of the draft bill, a weird omission, even an absurdity in legislation entitled ""parental involvement"".  After all parents have the right to attend school board meetings at present."

"234”, “We believe that the Headteacher should have the right to attend.  Councillors and others should attend by invitation."

"235”, “N / A"

"236”, “Same set up as current School Board would be sensible."

"237”, “"

"238”, “It is hard to comprehend how an effective forum could exist without the attendance of the HT.  How would partnership / communication develop without the attendance of the HT."

"239”, “The councillor, HT and teacher reps should attend."

"240”, “Head Teacher should definitely have right to attend.  See q10. ( Head Teacher should definitely have right to attend, and preferably community involvement, but parents should be in the majority.
Some parents feel they would be LESS likely to attend if school not  represented.  What would be the point if just parents discussing issues in isolation? )"

"241”, “We think that any Forum would be enhanced by attendance of Head Teacher / staff.  Local Councillor can always add to the support structure of the group.  Surely any group is set up to work with the school.  Parents Forums which are not structured could turn into chaos."

"242”, “Mandatory for Headteachers to attend and representation from staff members as happens at the moment.  Councillors should attend possible once a year."

"243”, “Qs 13/14 No.  Present structure suitable.
Headteacher/teachers HAVE to be there!  Communications vital between parties.
Cannot function without contact at meetings.
Councillors free to attend."

"244”, “Non members should be allowed to attend and participate on invitation."

"245”, “Head teacher & staff and Local Councillors by right.  They are necessary.  Other non-members by invitation.  Co-opted members as per bodies need."

"246”, “"

"247”, “"

"248”, “Head Teacher needs to be there to establish good liaison.  Teacher rep should always be there.  Non members - should only be there by invitation."

"249”, “Yes - non members only by invitation (parent).  I don't have an objection to attendance if they merely give prior notice rather than just turning up.  I do feel members of the teaching staff or councillors should have the authority to attend uninvited."

"250”, “By invitation"

"251”, “All parent forum meetings should be open to the public.  Head Teachers and Councillors should maintain the right to attend and advise.  Parent forums should be allowed to invite anyone to attend and speak at meetings - non-members should be invited whenever needed by parents forum.  No automatic right necessary."

"252”, “"

"253”, “"

"254”, “This is how the School Boards are running at the moment.  There has to be staff involvement and the help of a Councillor by invitation"

"255”, “We think that Head Teachers and Councillors should have the right to attend all meetings."

"256”, “The forum should have the right to meet without the Head Teacher"

"257”, “Non-members should attend by invitation, but in close communication with Head Teacher and staff member as on present School Board"

"258”, “Structure should be kept as it is.  Representative from school should always be present otherwise parents would not know what was going on in the school.  This would encourage rumour mongering and hearsay.  This encourages no consultation with school."

"259”, “We believe Head Teacher should be an integral part of the forum - other individuals (other than members) would be invited. Membership should be broader than parents and must include teacher representation.  Parents should probably be in the majority. "

"260”, “No - care has to be taken that parent forums do not become a closed meeting as there is no requirement for minutes, the group could discuss whatever they wanted could be used as a group where parents air grievances but don't have any formal method of taking this forward."

"261”, “Should have the right to attend by invitation."

"262”, “Somebody representing school education should attend (not necessarily Head Teacher)"

"263”, “Head Teacher's attendance compulsory! option to exclude if necessary.  Staff member - elected by staff.  Co-opted Community members.  Meetings open to anyone interested in school activities."

"264”, “We believe all sections of school life from pupil to local authority should be represented including staff and outside community, i.e. local business or other outside perspective."

"265”, “No.  Head Teacher and local councillor should have the right in fact obligation to attend."

"266”, “We should keep the status quo, where the Head Teacher is nearly always present, where councillors have the right to attend and where other people can be invited as and when necessary."

"267”, “"

"268”, “"

"269”, “It is good to have these people involved.  Meetings should be open where possible."

"270”, “No"

"271”, “I would like to see the Head Teacher or deputy of the school and co-opted members attend every meeting.  Increase the number of parent members and if non-members wish to attend this should be encouraged where a new issue requires discussion and concerns need to be voiced."

"272”, “We consider that meetings should be applicable to all as defined under the current legislation."

"273”, “I think attendance by Head Teacher or councillor should always be encouraged - by invitation, self invitation, whatever way possible!"

"274”, “The world has gone mad - we are talking about a School within a community - of course the Head Teacher should have the right to attend along with any other councillor or interested person if required/invited."

"275”, “The Head Teacher and councillor should have automatic right to attend and advise."

"276”, “What a waste of time this all is.  Head Teacher should have the right!  Of course he should have the right - he must be there and so should anybody else with any involvement in the school.  What is the point of having a meeting discussing the school when we have a bunch of parents who don't know a jot about the current issues or the educational needs of the running of the school."

"277”, “No - Head Teachers should attend as a matter of course.  How do the parents and vice versa, i.e. schools know what is going on in and around the school without management involvement.  A forum would just become a talking shop.  Anyone should be allowed to attend if they have an interest in the school.  Head Teachers could become much more authoritative and there would be an onus on no consultation."

"278”, “No - under the present system those with vested interest are presently involved in the process: parents, head teacher, teacher reps, local councillor, and co-opted members from the community.  That system works.  We have very serious reservations for a parents grouping to be able to meet without the presence and advice of the head teacher, teacher reps, local councillor and co-opted members from the community."

"279”, “I believe the Head Teacher has a right to attend meetings with councillors or other individuals being invited if and when required."

"280”, “"

"281”, “"

"282”, “Head should ALWAYS be included.  This is not about a struggle for power and control.  Anyone is welcome.  The chair should control the debate."

"283”, “It is imperative the Headteacher attend, or be able to attend, a parent forum.  Attendance by local councillor, community police, priest should be encouraged to assure community involvement."

"284”, “Majority responded that head teachers and councillors should be allowed to attend.
If parent forum is to promote and represent views of parents involved in their children’s education then teachers need to be present to ensure discussions are based on accurate information.
Minority - invitation regularly."

"285”, “"

"286”, “NB It is the view of (our) school board that these questions are too prescriptive in nature and do not give an opportunity to address some fundamental matters raised by the proposed new bill as drafted.  Please see our response in the additional comments box."

"287”, “Blank"

"288”, “Again, this is covered by the current rulings."

"289”, “"

"290”, “"

"291”, “We, as a school board, representing the views of parents whose children attend (our)Primary School, are unanimously rejecting the new proposal, and are against abolishment of the Scottish School Board 1988 Act."

"292”, “"

"293”, “"

"294”, “We believe that the present legislation for School Boards covers this question."

"295”, “The Headteacher should have the right to attend any meeting of the Parental Forum.  All others could be by invitation but that would be up to the parental forum to decide."

"296”, “"

"297”, “We feel strongly that both the head teacher and councillor need to be part of the forum and not ""optional"". Otherwise, decisions making will be severely impacted and if it is optional, there is a risk of non-attendance by head teachers which would undermine the remit of the forum."

"298”, “"

"299”, “"

"300”, “"

"301”, “"

"302”, “"

"303”, “"

"304”, “It is essential that the Headteacher and local councillor have the right to attend meetings.  For effective communication and decision making it is essential to have relevant information and representation.  Accordingly, current arrangements for School Boards and PTAs specifically require the inclusion of the Headteacher and representatives from the teaching staff.  The absence of such support from the school community and education authority would result in protracted debate and ineffective operation of parental forums. Under the draft consultation document, it is conceivable that multiple parental forums could be established within a single school, potentially consisting of individual parents, each requesting school and/or education authority support for information or representation.
"

"305”, “"

"306”, “The overall feeling of this group is that the HT or other teaching staff should be in attendance as it would defeat the purpose of the forum to discuss school matters without a full input. These meetings should be open to anyone with an interest although the right of speech should be with the chair of the group.
"

"307”, “"

"308”, “"

"309”, “"

"310”, “The head teacher should have to attend a majority of the time (as an advisor rather than an officer) and councillors or members of the Education Authority should be encouraged to attend as much as possible by invitation.
"

"311”, “The existing School Board works successfully and should not be replaced.  The Head-teacher and Councillor must have the right to attend a Board to assist in effective communication. Non member parents currently can attend School Board meetings and have a voice but no vote.
"

"312”, “"

"313”, “"

"314”, “This should not change from existing format"

"315”, “The Head Teacher should have the right to attend without doubt"

"316”, “The Head Teacher should be in attendance to share information and promote partnership.  They should have the right to attend and to speak but equally the current system which allows voting members to discuss items in private should continue.  Ideally, the local councillor should also attend to share relevant information.  The parent representative group should also have the right to invite other specialists to attend, e.g. police."

"317”, “We are of the opinion that the Head Teacher should attend."

"318”, “No"

"319”, “Do the teachers want their cake and eat it! The Headteacher should be a member (no vote) as should the local elected member.  An important body as this must have input for all agencies of the community and by statute be accountable."

"320”, “Head Teacher must attend meetings and if the local councillor wishes to attend then this is a vital link which can prove to be very helpful especially during times of refurbishment and PPP proposals."

"321”, “Head Teachers should be required to attend.  Staff members and community members should be co-opted.  Councillor representatives should be required to attend.  Meeting should be open to anyone with an interest in the school."

"322”, “The Councillor should have the right to attend. The HT a duty to attend.  Any parent should be able to attend but only those elected have the right to vote."

"323”, “No - attendance to official bodies and meetings must be retained as a right of attendance, not by invitation.  this must be an open meeting format to ensure fairness."

"324”, “In order to maintain open dialogue but also to ensure the quality of operation, the forums must preserve the rights of attendance for those members of the present School Board system.  You can only see invitations not being offered in situations where conflict exists."

"325”, “The Head Teacher should always have the right to attend."

"326”, “It would be preferable that Head Teacher/member of staff be a standing member, thus improving communications between school staff and parents forum.  Non-members should be invited to observe as at present.  Important that, in today's society, Boards have opportunity to co-opt church representative."

"327”, “Rights of attendance work well within School Boards and there is no need to change these.  It is unlikely that the Head Teacher, as the principal adviser to a School Board, would ever be excluded unless in very exceptional circumstances.  The current arrangements for inviting local councillors to attend School Boards work well and should not be changed."

"328”, “Believe Headteacher should have a duty to attend and pupils should be able to attend if appropriate."

"329”, “Non members by invitation.  Head Teacher mandatory.  Council as and when available to attend."

"330”, “Feel it would be essential for the Head Teacher to be in attendance at any meeting.  Meetings should be open to any interested parent."

"331”, “Parents must be in majority but must have staff representation and co-opted members from the community.  The local councillor plays a vital part in the School Board and his/her presence should be maintained."

"332”, “The presence of the Head Teacher is vital if the forum is to be fully aware of what is happening in the school.  The relationship between the forum and the Head Teacher is the basis of a fruitful partnership.  Councillors have normally been welcomed to Board meetings and there is no reason why this should not continue.  Attendance by other parents etc is currently allowed both by invitation and by right (for parents).  In the absence of evidence of problems arising from this any change would seem unnecessary."

"333”, “Non members of parent forum should attend only by invitation, but forums still should have some authority invested in them so they cannot be conveniently ignored."

"334”, “I think the head should always be invited to attend to keep good relationships between head and forum.  Others should attend by invitation as appropriate to specific issues."

"335”, “No"

"336”, “If the meeting is to be held on school property then certain safeguards must be in place.  School records, for example, must be kept inviolate.  Parents should be allowed on school premises for school meetings, discussions, etc.  If parents are organising the meeting then they decide their speakers, etc.  While I believe the Head Teacher should have the right to attend, it may be to his/her advantage not to, or to be 'available' in their office. Councillors or other individuals should be there by invitation.  It would be courteous to inform the Head Teacher about other invited speakers."

"337”, “Leave as at present"

"338”, “Meetings should be 'open' with formal agenda - includes other parents, teaching staff, councillors etc.  Someone should attend on behalf of the staff - e.g. Head Teacher.  Councillors attendance should be requested if specifically required."

"339”, “Don't agree - Head Teacher and councillor should have a right to attend School Board/parent forum meetings."

"340”, “"

"341”, “We believe the present legislation for School Boards covers this question."

"342”, “As it is the Head teacher who writes the School Development Plan, directs the school,  I would have thought it pretty fundamental that they are in attendance, also the local councillor, particularly if they sit on the Education Committee and a Education Authority Representative, so therefore they should have the right to attend."

"343”, “We object to the complicated language of this question! Under the present system, the Head Teacher attends as an advisor, with the right to attend.  This should continue.  Your question presupposes the establishment of parent forums."

"344”, “No.  We agree with the existing arrangement, where head teacher and councillors are expected to contribute.
 This helps parents to learn how to participate.
"

"345”, “One of the issues with current School Board regulations that acts as a barrier to wider parent participation is the lack of any 'open questions' period during board meetings where any parent has the opportunity to raise questions or concerns to the school board. This is an example of an incremental improvement that could benefit the current system.

The current school board system requires the head teacher to attend - and it is the opinion of this School Board that attendance of the Head Teacher is essential for all productive board meetings.  We cannot understand what benefit there would be in not inviting a head teacher or local councillor to any School Board or Forum meeting.  We are also concerned that the draft bill does not consider the ability that some head teachers may not wish to participate in parent forums - and will not be possibly obligated to do so.
"

"346”, “Headteachers should be required to attend in an advisory capacity. There should, however, be the option to exclude them if required.

Staff member representative, as chosen by the school, should be co-opted.

There should be the option to co-opt members from the wider community.

The meeting should be open to anyone with an interest in the school.

The provision should allow for more parents to be on the group than at present.

Councillor representatives should be required to attend.

This is another leading question.

The consensus is that the answer to Question 13 is No.
"

"347”, “Headteachers should be required to attend in an advisory capacity.
There should be staff representatives. There should be pupil representatives.
Councillors should be able to attend as of right.

"

"348”, “Whether it he parent forums or modernised School Boards we believe that it is paramount to the successful operation of the Board/forum that the Head Teacher has the right to attend and be an integral part of any arrangement.  You cannot speak of partnership and yet allow a key figure in that partnership to be excluded and subject to the vagaries of ""invitation"".  We should be encouraging open dialogue and setting an example to children as to how face-to-face talking through of issues is key to successful resolution.  Parents will always find ways of meeting/speaking without teaching staff present in order to formulate positions on certain issues and encouraging (we can only assume unintentionally) the latter in any structure is not the way forward.

In terms of the Councillor, our experience of having he/she present has been very positive.  Again it provides another perspective on issues but perhaps the role is one step divorced in the partnership so whether it requires the same rights is less certain. Perhaps for the latter and for other individuals, by invitation (which could be a ""standing"" invite for the Councillor) is sufficient as long as any request to attend is not unreasonably refused.
"

"349”, “It is reasonable to assume that the purpose of the parent forum is to promote contact between parents and the school. This could not be done without consultation between the Head Teacher and the parent forum and the Head Teacher's attendance should be assured.  The Head Teacher should have the right to attend or send a representative without the need for invitation. The current system whereby the Head Teacher is 'adviser to the School Board' is too vague and can result in conflict.  Other parents, councillors and teachers should have the right to attend all forum meetings."

"350”, “This question demonstrates why many people are so concerned about the proposals put out to consultation by the Scottish Executive.  Surely the Scottish Executive wants to facilitate a positive, pro-active working relationship between a Parental Forum and the school's Headteacher and the education authority.  How could this be achieved if Headteachers are not an integral part of the process?
Again the role of a Headteacher as a formal advisor to School Boards is a very effective relationship.  Similarly the local councillor needs to be a key partner in the activities of a Parent Forum.
"

"351”, “"

"352”, “"

"353”, “"

"354”, “This is an open forum and should not be held behind closed doors, cloaked in secrecy.  Teachers and Heads should be represented with non-members being invited as necessary.  School Boards run successfully with the proviso that the public can attend but not participate unless invited to do so.  This seems to work well so why break it up ?  This will only build a rift between parents and staff."

"355”, “Yes we have already given our views on this in our answer to question 10 and repeat this here for your convenience.  We believe that parent forums would benefit from having the flexibility to allow others to take part but should decide for themselves who the extra members should be.  We are particularly in favour of co-opted local non-parents and teachers being involved.  We also value the presence of the head teacher as an advisor.  We do believe each individual forum should decide for itself on non parent invitees.  We believe parents should be in a majority and should be free in their constitution to call occasional parent only meetings if necessary.
"

"356”, “"

"357”, “The existing arrangements are fine.  How can they be involved if they do not interact with staff and authority. "

"358”, “It should be allowable for Parent members to meet informally to discuss issues on their own, should they wish. However, the expectation/requirement should be that the Head Teacher should normally attend Parent Forum meetings, whether by duty or by right. Likewise, councillors."

"359”, “"

"360”, “All members have equal rights"

"361”, “- No. Potentially if saying no right to attend but can in effect be summoned would result in possibly Head Teachers and Councillors saying ""Don't want you to attend this meeting"".
- Will lead to break down and reduce effect of Councillors getting things done.
- Anyone should be able to attend meetings of School Boards but limited whether they can contribute unless asked by Chairperson and are excluded for sensitive matters - another reason why School Boards must stay as they are.
- Keep status quo.
- Greater community involvement fosters good relationships within the community.
- Head Teacher will listen to us and we can act in areas where Head cannot. e.g. concern about lifts in the building, but as a School Board we challenged this and we used other routes to get things discussed. Another example was the Section 28 Debate.
- It would be a foolish Head Teacher who would not bear in mind parents' views.
- School Board rightly consulted during the HMIE visits.
- Head would feel naked without the support of an elected legitimate parental forum.
"

"362”, “NO.  Everyone within the School community should have the ""right of attendance"" as valued Stakeholders. Headteacher and staff member must be included to develop a good working partnership as already exists within School Boards.  It is important that local councillors are invited to attend, in order to impart important information to the ""Forum"" from the local authority and vice versa.
"

"363”, “"

"364”, “"

"365”, “"

"366”, “We believe Head Teacher and councillor should have right to attend."

"367”, “"

"368”, “"

"369”, “HT - right to attend, Chaplain - right to attend, Councillor - invitation"

"370”, “All people with an active interest in the school should be able to attend.  Why have a closed shop?"

"371”, “No applicable as we disagree with the whole idea of these type of parent forums.  The Head Teacher should always have the right to attend."

"372”, “Right of attendance should continue for Head Teacher"

"373”, “N/A"

"374”, “Yes - 5 groups - invitation only when required (third parties)
No - 1 group - HT and teachers should legally be involved in advisory role"

"375”, “Everyone involved with the School should have the right to attend."

"376”, “No - it should be open to all members of the community and education services."

"377”, “We believe that schools along with any parent  groups should have an open door policy to  any parent or members of the community.  This will assist us with the overall enhancement of the way in which our school is run."

"378”, “The Head Teacher should be invited to attend but they should be expected to attend each Board/forum meeting as they are best placed to advise."

"379”, “We object to the complicated language of this question!  Under the present system the Head Teacher attends as an advisor, with the right to attend.  This should continue.  Your question pre-supposes the establishment of parent forums."

"380”, “No - there is a danger that the forum's ability to represent the views of all parents or to inform parents accurately on educational matters may conflict with the duty of the Head Teacher."

"381”, “How can a parent forum effectively represent the needs of parents and children in the school if the Head Teacher is not automatically attending each meeting.  Surely parent and school participation is the goal not separation from staff and school for parents  Some forums who do not communicate well with their Head Teacher would not effectively represent the needs of the children and parents."

"382”, “All school parents should have a right of attendance.  I also feel the Head Teacher, any other teacher, any pupil or a member of the authority should also have this right."

"383”, “We believe the Headteacher should be an active member of the forum along with other agreed representatives, teachers, co-opted community members, PTA rep, pupil rep.  Invitation to a councillor which is a good link to the education authorities.  The parent group should be able to meet on their own once a year.  An open meeting could be held if required."

"384”, “I would have though meetings should be public - so anyone would have the right to attend, although not necessarily the right to speak unless invited to do so.  If it were mandatory for the Head Teacher to attend there could be an embarrassing situation if he/she were up for discussion! (although he/she would have to be approached at some point in order to resolve any differences)."

"385”, “"

"386”, “"

"387”, “The Head Teacher or his/her representative should always attend.  Others by invitation."

"388”, “Open to all."

"389”, “Head Teacher should most definitely have right of attendance and their attendance should not be by invitation.  Consider their attendance vital in running of forums."

"390”, “Open access"

"391”, “The Head Teacher and local councillor should have the right to attend.  Others by invitation.  How can an organisation that is set up to 'involve parents better in schools' operate without the direct involvement of the Head Teacher?"

"392”, “I think that the Headteacher should always attend.  Others by invitation only."

"393”, “It is a duty/responsibility of the Head Teacher and Councillors to attend School Board meetings and this is invaluable.  Much of the business would not make sense without such links.  Head Teacher/Councillors have the right to attend."

"394”, “No - the Head Teacher should be required to attend.  Meetings should be open with parents able to contribute if invited to do so as with the current Boards."

"395”, “Head Teacher should be allowed to attend and contribute to enable the forum to know what is happening within the school."

"396”, “HTs should attend all meetings and participate.  Other parents should be invited and can be asked/invited to participate."

"397”, “Meetings should not be a closed shop."

"398”, “Head Teacher must be present.  How would forum understand the issues?  Must be present."

"399”, “Head Teacher should attend meetings;  there may be a meeting when asked specifically not to attend.  Others invited as and when necessary."

"400”, “Head Teacher should attend every meeting and invite other people as and when necessary."

"401”, “Don't understand the question(s)"

"402”, “I think that the Head Teacher should attend all meetings unless specifically asked not to."

"403”, “"

"404”, “The involvement of the Head Teacher in a school is an invaluable and positive requirement that should not be lost, as it would diminish the status of the parent body.  We therefore believe that it should be the right and duty of a Head Teacher to attend forum meetings and that she or he should be an integral part of the forum, much as the Head Teacher is the adviser to the School Board.  A Head Teacher should only be exempt or barred from attending meetings in specific circumstances that are set out in the proposed Act.  There is merit in allowing for some continued involvement of the local councillor in parent forums although there is currently great variation in how assiduously councillors attend School Board meetings at present and the support they choose to give when they do."

"405”, “The Headteacher should be a member of the Board. A Board meeting should be an open meeting, appropriately advertised to allow all interested people to attend. At these meetings everybody should have the right to speak. (Our) Primary School Board considers that the current rule that people can only speak if invited by the Chair, gives the impression that Boards are exclusive. The Chair is responsible for the running of the meeting and this person can use their authority to ensure the meeting runs appropriately.
"

"406”, “We should retain the right to invite anyone and not unreasonably refuse a request to attend.  We feel that it is essential that the head teacher should be required to attend - as an adviser and not a member.  Councillors should retain the right to attend.
"

"407”, “No. To be successful the Parent Forum must have a strong working relationship with the Head Teacher and we feel it is essential that the Head Teacher is present at all meetings.  To form a Forum where the Head Teacher was not invited, and by implication, not welcome be incredibly divisive and damaging to parent representation in the school. Local Councillors do not need a mandatory right to
 attend, but they should be a regular invitee to the Forum as both an advisor and resource. On balance, we would prefer the rights of Head Teachers and Councillors to remain."

"408”, “"

"409”, “As per the School Boards (Scotland) Act 1988"

"410”, “"

"411”, “"

"412”, “Members of the Parent Forum (or School Board) should be able to meet without the head teacher present, if they want to, since there are times when discussion can be inhibited by the head's presence.

"

"413”, “"

"414”, “Blank"

"415”, “"

"416”, “"

"417”, “"

"418”, “"

"419”, “Yes.  Membership should be confined to parents and to co-opted individuals but there must be a mechanism allow to engagement with the Head Teacher.  This may be by their being in attendance.  Without the Head Teacher, the work of any parent forum will be in a vacuum and largely meaningless."

"420”, “"

"421”, “"

"422”, “"

"423”, “No. The head teacher is a vital element of ensuring communication between the school and any parental body (either School Board, PTA or the suggested new parent forum).

 The draft bill states that Council Officers and Elected Representatives would not have the automatic right to attend and address the forum. The forum would be able to invite such representatives to meetings but it is proposed that there would not be any legislative requirement for them to attend.
 Attendance would therefore be up to the discretion of the individual approached to attend a meeting. The Director of Education for example would no longer be legally required to attend the parent forum

 It is an essential part of parental involvement to ensure that parents can continue to work in partnership with the local authority. There needs to continue to be an obligation on officials and officers to offer support, advice and participate within the proceedings where necessary."

"424”, “We feel that at present with School Boards, Headteachers should have a contractual obligation to attend meetings to allow sensible, regular consultation between parents and teaching professionals. Other non-members should be required by law to respond appropriately if interaction is on a matter of importance to parents and the non-members have relevant information."

"425”, “"

"426”, “Definitely believe that HT/Councillor should have right to attend."

"427”, “We think it is important that the Headteacher has the right to attend since the point of the forum is to encourage partnership between the school and parents.  We also think that it is important that a balanced view is taken of the number of meetings, in order to avoid over burdening parent and teacher members.  Attendance of others should be subject to local requirements
"

"428”, “This question demonstrates why many people are so concerned about the proposals put out to consultation by the Scottish Executive. Surely the Scottish Executive wants to facilitate a positive, pro-active working relationship between a Parental Forum and the school's head teacher and the education authority. How could this be achieved if head teachers are not an integral part of the process?

Again the role of a Head teacher as a formal advisor to School Boards is a very effective relationship.  Similarly the local councillor needs to be a key partner in the activities of a Parent Forum.
"

"429”, “The status quo is perfect: the Board values the attendance of the head teacher and councillors.  Members of the public can attend at present and the system works well."

"430”, “Head teachers should have the right to attend forum meetings.  If the Head teacher does not attend these meetings then the forum will have no feedback from the school and the whole exercise will be obviated.  With regard to Councillors the same rights should be continued as at present.  Councillors who are in contact with the school and parents have a better understanding of any problems being experienced, or items of excellence and interest, which can be taken forward more easily to Council.  Any other non-members of the forum should attend by invitation only."

"431”, “The prominent advisory and communication role played by the head teacher or senior management team is one of the areas which we feel the current School Boards very much have right, and this must not be lost when they are amended. Also, our experience involves very helpful input from our local councillor, and we believe such attendances at future School Board meetings are to be encouraged. The role of head teachers and local councillors in parent forums - as we have outlined them in earlier answers, not as defined in the draft bill - would need to evolve with experience."

"432”, “Definitely NO.  How can the forum support the school and children’s' education without close consultation with the Head teacher?  The Head teacher should be present as of right in an advisory capacity. This will also prevent inappropriate discussions taking place (i.e. of named pupil or staff). Councillors should also have the right to attend - how can they support the school and community if they are not kept up to date. Also, they con be extremely helpful and supportive as they have a wealth of local knowledge and information."

"433”, “DON'T AGREE-. Head teacher and councillor should have a right to attend school board/parent forum meetings."

"434”, “If the ethos behind this legislation is to encourage parental involvement, community involvement and school involvement, the Board believes that non- members should be entitled to attend without invitation.  In the today's society, it is important that such meetings are open and transparent so that the forum can operate in an impartial way and members held accountable.  The contribution of head teachers and councillors cannot be underestimated as they will often provide information not otherwise available and ensure that debate is well-rounded and comprehensive."

"435”, “If it involves the school, the Head teacher should have the right to attend.  There should definitely be some type of school management representation.  Not having provisions where co-opted members such as a church representative on Catholic School Boards or a Head teacher and staff representative leads to a weakening of our statutory rights and could also lead to dangerous gaps in communication between parents and the school management - not in the best interests of the school community."

"436”, “We believe the head teacher should have the right to attend, and the councillor and/or other individuals should be able to attend by invitation."

"437”, “Disagree.  Head teachers should be required to attend in an advisory capacity.  There should, however, be the option to exclude them if required.
- Staff member representative, as chosen by the staff, should be a member
- There should be the option to co-opt members from the wider community.
- The meeting should be open to anyone with an interest in the school."

"438”, “The existing arrangements are generally satisfactory.  The head teacher is expected to attend as ""adviser"" and his attendance, experience & general contribution is always a key element of meetings and the exchange of information to Parent.   Note that this question is poorly stated.  The question assumes that the Draft Bill arrangements are inevitable."

"439”, “We think the Head teacher should always attend as in School Board format.  In our experience as a school board, without his/her involvement it would be very difficult for the forum to be kept up to date with school activities/information etc.  In the case of denominational schools, there should also be a religious representative, as these schools and their religious counterparts generally work together, in co-operation with parents.  However other attendees should be by invitation."

"440”, “No.  Current arrangements for the attendance of head teachers, or their representative m an advisory capacity, should remain.  Elected councillors often work hard to progress the schools in their wards and should also have the right to attend, as should teachers.  Schools are a partnership."

"441”, “Should remain similar to the school board arrangements to ensure some order is maintained.  Headteacher should have the right to attend."

"442”, “Yes"

"443”, “"

"444”, “"

"445”, “"

"446”, “Non-members should be free to attend and raise relevant issues without invitation."

"447”, “Yes - invitation only with the exception of the Head teacher.  This enables free discussion without bias from others."

"448”, “"

"449”, “No.  They should have the right to attend and the Head Teacher must attend."

"450”, “Head Teacher without invite.  All others by invitation."

"451”, “No"

"452”, “"

"453”, “No"

"454”, “As stated at Question 10 - the head teacher should be actively involved."

"455”, “"

"456”, “"

"457”, “Yes"

"458”, “Headteachers should have the right to attend and be encouraged, others by invitation."

"459”, “No, head teacher should have right of attendance.  Meetings should be open."

"460”, “No.  We do not agree with parent forum.  The Headteacher must attend as he is the person who is able to respond to any questions or discussions on all school matters.  The Headteacher is the most important member of any school board.
Councillors can also be invaluable when tackling specific issues."

"461”, “Disagree.  Headteacher, staff & councillor are essential."

"462”, “Staff must be able to attend to ensure open communication.  Education should be a partnership between home and school, this can not be achieved without the ""school"" being present."

"463”, “Headteacher should have a right to attend."

"464”, “Teaching staff must have the right to attend if they want to, must have full voting powers."

"465”, “Head teachers - essential
Clerk - essential
Councillors - highly desirable
Meetings must be open (freedom of information)."

"466”, “Disagree - the head teacher should attend"

"467”, “No - we believe the head teacher should be in  attendance."

"468”, “No, Headteacher MUST attend, and teaching rep and invite councillors on a regular basis."

"469”, “Yes"

"470”, “Should attend by invitation"

"471”, “Head teacher should have the right to attend.  It is ridiculous to establish a forum to promote partnership between school and home and then exclude one of the partners.  (The Minister) is very naive if he believes the draft bill does not prevent or discourage head teacher attendance at forum meetings.  The whole emphasis has changed."

"472”, “We believe that teachers and Headteachers should be full voting members and church and community leaders should be involved, with full rights of attendance."

"473”, “The head teacher and the local councillor should have the right to attend."

"474”, “It is absolutely essential that the Headteacher should attend, as non attendance could lead to dangerous gaps in communication between parents and the school management.  We should be working in partnership with our schools not looking to sever existing strong links."

"475”, “We feel that there is no point in a forum without the Headteacher in attendance.  We also believe that non-members (such as councillors and local community members) play an important role and should have the right to be there.  We believe that parents would lose interest in the parent forum if the head teacher and staff were not involved.  If the head teacher doesn't have the right to attend, it would undermine the working partnerships which have been built up so successfully between many school boards and the school staff."

"476”, “Right to attend with prior notice should continue."

"477”, “No.  Meetings need to be open to all to show that everything is fair and transparent.  The head teacher should have the right to attend.  A local authority representative and the local councillor should be obliged to attend at least annually."

"478”, “No.  Removing the right to attendance is a retrograde step.  Head teachers should be compelled to attend."

"479”, “It is a backward step to make no compulsion on council officials, Headteacher, etc to attend board meetings.  To do this takes away the power of a school board.  If our Headteacher, education department official and councillor didn't attend, how could we make sure that our concerns were going to be properly listened to?"

"480”, “The Headteacher and the councillor should have the right to attend.  Others should attend only by invitation."

"481”, “If the head teacher does not attend then the forum will only be a talking shop and vital information will be lost to parents."

"482”, “Head teacher and councillor should have the right to attend meetings with others having the right to attend by invitation."

"483”, “It is essential that head teachers have the right to attend otherwise the interest of the school will not be served - councillors should also have a right.  Ideally the head teachers and councillor should be seen as part of the forum although need not attend every meeting."

"484”, “Head teachers must always have the right to attend and should encouraged by EA to do so.  Councillors should be encouraged to attend but not so sure if that should extend to must always have the right to attend.  i.e. possible to call a meeting closed to a councillor, but not possible to call a meeting close to the school's head teacher."

"485”, “Head teacher and councillor should attend to  facilitate discourse between parents, staff and LA."

Parent Forums - Draft Bill